Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

With the development of increasingly potent and selective ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), resistance is commonly mediated by ALK-independent mechanisms, such as bypass pathway activation. As bypass signaling dependencies vary across ALK-rearranged (ALK+) lung cancers, a multipronged approach is needed to broadly suppress potential bypass signals. We have identified MET activation in 20% of ALK+ tumors that are resistant to next-generation ALK TKIs. In preclinical studies, dual ALK/MET blockade re-sensitized MET-amplified ALK+ tumors to lorlatinib. MEK and SHP2 have recently been identified as important effector proteins downstream of several bypass signaling pathways. In ALK+ models harboring diverse bypass signals, pairing an ALK TKI with either a MEK or SHP2 inhibitor demonstrated broad anti-proliferative activity. Based on these findings, we will conduct a clinical trial to evaluate lorlatinib in combination with a MET, MEK, or SHP2 inhibitor for patients with ALK+ lung cancers with ALK-independent resistance. Serial tumor biopsies will be analyzed to characterize molecular determinants of response to combination therapy and identify expression changes induced by treatment. This innovative multi-arm trial will also assess whether dynamics of genetic alterations in plasma can be used to guide intensification of treatment from monotherapy to early combination therapy for patients who have not yet developed resistance to ALK-directed therapy. Collectively, the studies in this grant strive to develop diverse strategies for overcoming ALK-independent resistance, a heterogeneous molecular entity that undermines efficacy of current ALK therapeutics.

Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are available for the treatment of ALK+ NSCLC, but resistance to all ALK TKIs (including alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib) has been reported and occurs through a variety of mechanisms. Once patients develop resistance to available ALK inhibitors, they are typically treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy rather than immunotherapy since response rates to PD-1 pathway inhibitors in this population are very low. However, our work in mouse models of ALK+ NSCLC has demonstrated that a vaccine generated against the rearranged portion of ALK can both prevent the development of ALK+ tumors and also more effectively treat them once they arise. We have also recently found evidence for anti-ALK immune responses in patients, as a subset of them generate spontaneous ALK autoantibodies.

We aim to translate our preclinical findings to a first-in-human clinical trial. Aim 1 will test the safety and efficacy of a novel ALK vaccine + an amphiphilic CpG toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant, administered in combination with an ALK TKI or PD-1 inhibitor in patients with TKI-resistant ALK-positive NSCLC. In Aim 2, using liquid chromatography data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry, we will directly identify antigenic ALK peptides presented by MHC molecules on the surface of cancer cells from tumor biopsies obtained on trial participants. In Aim 3, we will study pre- and post-vaccination anti-ALK T-cell responses among trial participants by analyzing peripheral leukocytes and intratumoral immune cells. The overarching goal is to develop a vaccine that stimulates patients’ immune cells to recognize and eliminate ALK+ tumors.

Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Most patients with mNSCLC are treated with systemic agents, which prolong survival and improve symptoms, but are typically not curative. Although recent advancements in immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the management of mNSCLC lacking targetable driver mutations, only a fraction of mNSCLC patients benefit from immunotherapy. Emerging evidence suggests that ablative radiotherapy can augment immunotherapy responses in metastatic disease; however, strategies to optimize the synergy between local radiation and the immune system are not well defined. We are conducting a randomized phase I/II clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination immune checkpoint blockade (ipilimumab + nivolumab) plus multisite ablative radiotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with mNSCLC. As a secondary analysis of the phase I trial, we propose to investigate biomarkers associated with treatment response. In Aim 1, we propose to compare the diagnostic accuracy of established clinical biomarkers, including PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), tumor mutational burden, gene expression profiles, and multiplex IHC in predicting response to combination ablative radiotherapy and immunotherapy. In Aim 2, we propose to characterize global transcriptional and genomic changes induced by radiation when given prior to or concurrently with immunotherapy and evaluate whether these changes are associated with treatment response. In addition, in Aim 3, we propose to validate a novel biomarker derived from alternative splicing as a predictor of radio-immunotherapy response. By elucidating the immunomodulatory properties of radiotherapy, we may be able to improve treatment responses and long-term survival in patients with mNSCLC.

KRAS mutations are the most common activating mutation in lung cancer and are identified in 25-30% of cases of lung adenocarcinoma. The clinical activity of molecularly targeted therapy in KRAS mutant lung cancer has been limited, as most prior approaches focused on downstream targets of the MAPK pathway, an approach which was largely ineffective. KRAS G12C is the most common subtype of activating KRAS mutation in NSCLC. Identification of a binding pocket of KRAS G12C enabled the development of covalent inhibitors (Ostrem et al. Nature, 2013), which selectively bind to the mutant cysteine and spare wild type or other mutant KRAS proteins (hereafter referred to as G12Ci). These drugs bind only to GDP-bound (i.e. inactive) KRAS G12C and trap the oncoprotein in its inactive state by preventing nucleotide exchange (Lito et al. Science, 2016). Of this new class of agents, two drugs (MRTX849 and AMG510) have demonstrated efficacy in early phase clinical trials, representing a remarkable breakthrough in the management of KRAS G12C mutant lung cancer. Acknowledging the limited number of patients treated thus far, response rates of 40-50% have been reported, demonstrating clinical activity far superior to prior molecularly targeted approaches for the management of KRAS mutant lung cancer. Despite this major advance it is clear that resistance to therapy, both primary and acquired, will remain a challenge and may in part be due to upstream receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance to this new class of therapy is of paramount importance to improve the efficacy and durability of response, and for identifying rational combinatorial therapies for future clinical trials.

The majority of lung cancer patients present with advanced disease that is largely incurable. Efforts to improve the early detection of this disease are critical to decrease lung cancer-related mortality. Low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening in high risk patients has demonstrated reduction in lung cancer related mortality through diagnosis of earlier stage disease at the cost of high false-positive rates and the frequent need for invasive diagnostic testing when indeterminate lung nodules are identified. Detecting tumor specific somatic mutations and/or epigenetic signatures in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents an attractive non-invasive method for identifying early stage lung cancer. However, to realize this promise for lung cancer screening, where ctDNA from small tumors is miniscule, the development of sensitive, specific, and economical ctDNA based assays is critical. 
The bacterial innate immune system consisting of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and their associated endonucleases (CRISPR-Cas) are specifically adapted to recognize foreign nucleic acids. The recent identification and diagnostic adaptation of certain classes of CRISPR-Cas systems, such as CRISPR-Cas12a and -Cas13a, offer unique platforms on which to develop sensitive, specific, and economical assays for the detection of ctDNA. The goal of the current project is to develop CRISPR-Cas12a and -Cas13a based ctDNA assays that can sensitively detect somatic cancer mutations and aberrant promoter hypermethylation often found in lung cancer patients and to validate these assays in plasma samples of patients with early stage NSCLC and in discriminating between benign and malignant nodules identified by low-dose CT screening studies. 

This project describes a 3-year training program for a career as a physician-scientist with the long term goal of establishing a research program within the field of translational thoracic oncology. The applicant is currently an Instructor of Medicine in the Section of Interventional Pulmonology and Thoracic oncology conducting research in developing biomarkers for the treatment selection and monitoring of patients with lung cancer. The research focus of this proposal is to develop molecular markers to better identify the subgroup of patients that will respond to PD1/PDL1 therapies in order to avoid unnecessary toxicities, reduce costs, and enable more appropriate therapies to be delivered. This goal will be accomplished in two complementary specific aims. In Specific Aim 1, a novel approach to acquire fresh tissue samples for immunophenotyping will be utilized to prospectively determine the ability of deep T cell phenotyping and functional assays to predict response to anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy using multi-parametric flow cytometry. In Specific Aim 2, a newly developed technique that enables the quantitative measurement of circulating PDL1 exosomes will be utilized to determine the association of pretreatment and on-treatment exosomal PDL1 expression levels to predict clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving checkpoint blockade. The training component of this proposal includes formal coursework, participation in a rich environment of post-doctoral lectures in thoracic oncology/tumor immunology, acquisition of advanced laboratory techniques, and individual mentoring. This project will take place under the supervision of Dr. Steven Albelda who is the Director of the Thoracic Oncology Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania and Co-Director of the Abramson Cancer Center’s Translational Center of Excellence for Lung Cancer Immunobiology, and Dr. Anil Vachani who is the Director of Clinical Research for the Section of Interventional Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology at Penn. Dr. Albelda and Dr. Vachani have mentored over 100 trainees. In addition, an advisory committee of distinguished scientists will provide experimental assistance, intellectual guidance, and career advice throughout the duration of this award.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has demonstrated profound effects on the anti-tumor immune response and has revolutionized the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While chemotherapy has traditionally been viewed as detrimental to the immune system, recent clinical trials have demonstrated an impressive survival benefit when combining checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy (ICB+chemo) relative to chemotherapy alone. Despite this, many NSCLC patients do not achieve clinical benefit from ICB, even when combined with chemotherapy. The role of tumor mutational burden, and specifically T cells targeting neoantigens derived from these mutations, has been demonstrated in several ICB studies, however these factors have yet to be fully explored in chemotherapy-containing ICB treatment regimens. There is thus an urgent need to understand the effects of ICB+chemo on the anti-tumor immune response and to specifically evaluate how chemotherapy perturbs the phenotype and function of anti-tumor T cells. It is of paramount importance that we understand how PD-1 blockade and chemotherapy synergize to promote anti-tumor immunity in order to better stratify patients most likely to benefit from these treatments. We propose herein to perform the first comprehensive evaluation of the phenotype and function of neoantigen-specific T cells and their dynamics before and after treatment with ICB+chemo relative to ICB alone. The findings from this study will provide a detailed atlas of the immune system dynamics following treatment and will result in the development of an immunometabolic signature that will be correlated with clinical outcome. Importantly, the results of the proposed work will deepen our understanding of the immune response to ICB+chemo and will unravel the mechanisms underlying clinical response in NSCLC patients.

Targeted therapies, such as ALK inhibitors, represent a major advance in the treatment of lung cancer patients with specific oncogenic drivers. However, these patients relapse due to acquired or intrinsic resistance to these agents. While targeting immnoevasive pathways, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown efficacy in a subset of lung cancer patients who have progressed on other therapies, the response rate in ALK-positive lung cancer to these agents is very low, underscoring the need to identify other potential regulators of the anti-tumor immune response. The complement pathway is a component of the innate immune response, which regulates the adaptive immune system. Complement activation, initiated through multiple pathways, leads to a series of proteolytic cascades that generate inflammatory mediators designated as anaphylatoxins (C3a, C5a).

Our laboratory has employed an immunocompetent orthotopic model of lung cancer progression, where lung cancer cells are implanted into the lungs of syngeneic mice. To study pathways regulating progression of ALK-positive lung cancer, we have developed a panel of murine lung cancer cell lines with the oncogenic driver EML4/ALK. Using both genetic and pharmacological approaches we have demonstrated that while these tumors are resistant to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy, they are strongly inhibited by blocking the complement pathway. This project will define the mechanisms of complement activation, and the cellular and molecular mechanisms whereby complement inhibition blocks ALK-positive tumor progression. Studies will test a panel of complement inhibitors targeting different steps in the complement cascade and validate complement activation in human ALK-positive lung tumors.

ALK rearrangements define a distinct molecular subset of NSCLC and confer sensitivity to treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These agents have produced dramatic improvements in clinical outcomes among ALK-rearranged (ALK+) patients, yet acquired resistance remains a major challenge. Thus, there is an urgent need for alternative therapeutic approaches for this disease. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting negative regulators of the immune response (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1) have emerged as powerful new therapies in NSCLC. In preliminary analyses, we and others have observed that ALK+ lung cancers are generally less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We hypothesize that distinct immune-based strategies may therefore be needed for ALK+ lung cancers. To inform these strategies, we will investigate 1) tumor-intrinsic factors associated with immunogenicity in ALK+ tumors (e.g., neoantigens, tumor mutation burden), 2) tumor-immune cell interactions (e.g., PD-L1 expression, alternative checkpoint expression, antigen presentation), and 3) endogenous T cell responses against ALK in the peripheral blood. Together, these studies may lay the groundwork for development of biomarkers informing optimal delivery of PD-(L)1 therapy in ALK+ lung cancers, while also promoting the development of novel combinations and approaches, including autologous cellular therapies directed against ALK.

Several ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are available for the treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but resistance to all ALK TKIs (including crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) has been reported and occurs through a variety of mechanisms. Once patients develop resistance to available ALK inhibitors, they are typically treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy rather than immunotherapy since response rates to PD-1 pathway inhibitors in this population are very low. However, our work in mouse models of ALK-positive NSCLC has demonstrated that a vaccine generated against the rearranged portion of ALK can both prevent the development of ALK-positive tumors and also more effectively treat them once they arise. In addition, we have recently found evidence of an anti-ALK immune response in patients, as a subset of them generate spontaneous ALK autoantibodies.

To more deeply characterize anti-ALK immunologic responses in patients, we propose (Aim 1) to determine if the presence of anti-ALK antibodies correlates with progression-free and overall survival among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, and (Aim 2) to directly identify and validate antigenic ALK peptides in different HLA-haplotype backgrounds. Antigenic peptides that are identified through these studies will serve as the basis for a therapeutic ALK peptide vaccine clinical trial, for which funding has been secured independently.