Liquid biopsy

Side effects of immune checkpoint therapies, termed immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), are unique and generally secondary to inflammatory tissue damage. The onset and duration of irAEs are unpredictable and predisposing factors for individuals to develop irAEs remains unclear. Some irAEs that emerge with immune checkpoint blockade share clinical features of autoimmune conditions. Preexisting auto-reactive antibodies and their contribution to immune side effects with immunotherapy and radiation have not been defined. This maybe particularly relevant to immune related adverse effects, since recent studies suggest almost 8-9% of the US population carries autoimmune diseases and 26% of healthy individuals have strong IgG humoral responses to variety of self-antigens. For the proposed study, we will use a set of longitudinally collected patient blood samples from a clinical trial which evaluates the clinical activity of combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without local consolidative therapy (stereotactic body irradiation) 

We plan to follow preexisting auto-reactive antibodies, baseline T and B cell receptor clonality and their temporal dynamics for combination immune checkpoint therapy with or without radiation therapy and correlate these findings with irAEs and response to therapy.    

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cancer cells that break away from either the primary tumor or metastatic sites. Increasingly, CTCs have been used as a readily accessible source of tumor cells (“liquid biopsy”). However, shortcomings in current CTC technologies limit downstream analyses to assessment of a selected set of nucleic acid markers. Genome and transcriptome-wide analyses of CTCs have been hampered by the low purity of CTC isolates. The complex and protracted nature of CTC capture protocols further impedes analysis.

Dr. Kulkarni and his group have developed a CTC capture technology known as Vortex Chip, which allows for rapid isolation of highly purified CTCs. In addition to standard immunofluorescence, they have generated proof-of-principle evidence that their capture technology allows for analysis of genetic material. Moreover, because the Vortex Chip isolates CTCs based on their size, their chip does not require antibody-based capture that can potentially bias isolation of CTC subpopulations. Serial CTC analyses performed in the context of treatment changes can characterize the mutational landscape of tumors as they evolve in response to therapy and thereby identify molecular predictors and drivers of treatment resistance and sensitivity to novel anti-tumor therapies.

Their project has two goals: 1) validate use of CTCs as biomarker in lung cancer and 2) explore use of CTC analysis to obtain genetic information about the tumor. They hypothesize that the unique microfluidic characteristics of lung CTCs will drive rapid isolation of pure CTC populations for analysis to characterize heterogeneity and profile therapeutic responsiveness.

Three independent principal investigators at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center with combined expertise in thoracic oncology, cancer epidemiology and prevention, and molecular diagnostics are joining efforts to respond to the Protect Your Lungs RFA. The proposed research program is focused on developing novel blood-based tests to 1) identify never-smoker subjects at increased risk of developing lung cancer (C. Li, PI), 2) detect lung cancer before onset of symptoms (G. Goodman, PI),  and 3) distinguish between benign and malignant lesions identified by CT scans (S. Hanash, PI). The research questions address important public health issues in lung cancer and build on discoveries of candidate markers by the applicant group for which we propose validation studies in this proposal. Validation studies to be conducted will take advantage of the availability to the investigators of pertinent bio-specimens consisting of samples derived from two large cohort studies (The Women’s Health Initiative and the Beta Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET)) and samples derived from CT screening studies. The samples available are sufficient to meet the needs of the proposed studies. The collaborative nature of the proposed research will ensure synergism and efficiency of scale to meet study objectives and fast-track the development of clinically relevant applications.

Inhibitors of the VEGF pathway, including the VEGF antibody bevacizumab (BV) and multitargeted VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as vandetanib, have in some cases improved progression-free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced NSCLC. While benefits in the overall NSCLC population have thus far been modest, it is clear that a subset of patients have dramatic benefit, while others may experience no benefit or even life-threatening toxicities. Furthermore, virtually all patients who respond inevitably develop therapeutic resistance. Thus, the development of markers predictive of response or resistance for VEGF inhibitors is critically needed to advance NSCLC treatment. There are currently no validated predictive markers for VEGF inhibitors, and the development of such markers is made more challenging by the impact of both tumor- and host-derived circulating factors on tumor angiogenesis. Useful predictive markers will likely need to reflect factors from both sources. We hypothesize that by comprehensively profiling angiogenesis-related CAFs and other peptides in the blood, as well as germline variations in angiogenesis-related genes, non-invasive predictive markers for identifying which patients benefit from VEGF inhibitors (alone or with chemotherapy) can be developed and validated.

The investigators of this proposal have a longstanding collaboration to develop predictive markers for VEGF inhibitors and, along with other investigators, have identified three promising and potentially complementary approaches using blood-based markers that will be tested in this grant. We have also played leadership roles in major randomized clinical trials of VEGF inhibitors, which have enabled us to leverage a unique set of resources to address these questions.

In Aim 1, we will use multiplexed CAF profiling to identify high-priority candidate predictive markers for differential benefit from VEGF inhibitors with chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone using two independent sets of samples from randomized phase II trials: one testing bevacizumab (BV) with chemotherapy (pemetrexed/carboplatin or Pem/C) vs. Pem/C alone (BATTLE-FL) trial, and another testing the VEGFR/EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor vandetanib (VAN) plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (VCP) vs. CP, in first-line NSCLC trial. We will also test CAF markers of benefit for VAN vs. standard therapy with erlotinib using specimens from a recently completed randomized phase III trial (ZEST).

In Aim 2, we will use MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight) mass spectroscopy to develop a serum proteomic classifier for benefit for VEGF inhibitors, using samples from the same trials as in Aim 1. We previously used a similar approach to develop a serum proteomic marker of benefit (Veristrat) for EGFR inhibitors.

Finally, in Aim 3, we will validate a signature of SNPs from three angiogenesis-related genes that were found to be predictive of benefit for BV with CP (BCP) vs. CP in the ECOG4599 trial. This will be tested in the same three trials of VEGF inhibitors. It is worth noting that our interest is not in developing markers for a particular drug, but rather to identify markers and pathways relevant to predicting response or resistance to inhibitors of the VEGF pathway, a validated therapeutic target in NSCLC. Our data thus far suggest there will be overlap in markers for BV and VEGFR TKIs but it will be important to determine whether this is true, particularly as more potent and specific inhibitors are tested.

Impact. This project has the potential to address a critical unmet need in NSCLC by producing validated, non-invasive blood-based predictive markers for identifying patients more likely to benefit from VEGF inhibitors, and can provide critical insights into mechanisms of resistance to guide future combination regimens.

Pulmonary nodules found on imaging studies are a significant diagnostic problem. Most lesions are indeterminate, but because of the concern for lung cancer all patients require further evaluation with resultant radiation risk, significant cost, and delays in diagnosis. We believe that the development of a serum test for lung cancer would have a significant impact on patient care and outcomes. We recently identified a novel panel of 25 serum autoantibodies associated with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and constructed a protein microarray containing the autoantigens. In a pilot study, we tested the microarray with human sera and developed a classification algorithm that incorporated microarray test results with nodule size. This algorithm had an overall sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 83% for the diagnosis of lung cancer. We now propose to further develop this panel and hypothesize that an autoantibody signature along with nodule size will be able to determine which patients have lung cancer.

Evaluating suspicious pulmonary nodules in the setting of a lung cancer diagnostic work-up is a common clinical management challenge. High resolution multi-detector computed tomography visualizes many noncalcified lesions that could represent either potentially lethal cancers or benign processes. Although the vast majority of these nodules are benign, non-neoplastic lesions, a subset will be malignant and in these cases, patients could benefit from immediate treatment. A non-invasive test that maintains a high sensitivity and specificity across the spectrum of clinical presentations of pulmonary nodules would be of tremendous clinical benefit by reducing the number unnecessary invasive procedures and minimizing the time between detection and definitive treatment. The overall goal for the proposed studies is to develop a convenient and low-cost serum test that will, either alone or in combination with clinical features, accurately classify indeterminate nodules and direct proper clinical management. Our approach to develop such a test will be to profile and identify which proteins detected in the serum at the time of the detection of these nodules were immunogenic and induced the production of circulating autoantibodies. Differences in the autoantibody profile between the malignant and non-malignant groups will then be further evaluated against additional clinical specimens from both our institution and two pre-specified collaborator institutions to identify the optimal test for this urgent clinical need. Once completed, we anticipate this test will aid clinicians in deciding the optimal treatment for patients found to have suspicious nodules and improve the current standard of care.

The release of small amounts of cell-free DNA into the bloodstream from dying tumor cells has been well documented in patients with various malignancies. Driven by improvements in assay technologies, such circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is beginning to show excellent promise as a non-invasive cancer biomarker. Because unique somatic mutations can serve as telltale marks to distinguish tumor-derived DNA in plasma, the cancer specificity of ctDNA is expected to be very high, making it an attractive candidate as a biomarker for cancer screening. Because many somatic mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are found clustered with high frequency within a small set of genes, detection of ctDNA in such patients is technically more tractable. We have created a highly multiplexed, ultrasensitive assay that uses next-generation sequencing techniques to quantify low-abundance mutant DNA fragments in plasma against a large excess of background wild-type DNA. Our assay can simultaneously evaluate mutations in 40 different hotspots in up to 96 patient samples, using novel error suppression methods to optimize detection sensitivity. We have shown that the assay is capable of measuring very small amounts of mutant ctDNA in a limited set of patients with early-stage disease or with small, localized recurrences. We now aim to test the clinical performance of the assay on a larger scale. We propose to perform a case-control study comparing patients with early-stage NSCLC to individuals with a heavy smoking history or individuals having benign pulmonary nodules.

Better methods are required to accurately risk stratify patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) who may undergo unnecessary procedures to exclude a cancer diagnosis. 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a widely available clinical test used to evaluate concerning SPNs and stage malignant lung nodules. It therefore facilitates clinical assessment but remains an imperfect tool for the diagnosis, localization, and prognostication of SPNs, be they infectious or malignant in nature. Furthermore, it performs well for staging lung cancer, but inaccurately categorizes patients in some cases who receive futile thoracotomies for disseminated disease, or conversely, are undertreated for localized disease. The applicant therefore plans on investigating whether circulating molecular biomarkers can increase the utility of 18F-FDG-PET imaging in clinical practice using statistical models that incorporate in vivo and in vitro diagnostics The concept here is “one-stop shopping,” where a patient can obtain routine molecular imaging and molecular diagnostics from routine blood work during an appointment that in combination increase the accuracy of a clinician’s diagnosis and facilitate the appropriate decision-making process. For this proposal we will develop a model that incorporates a circulating microRNA profile to discriminate infectious from malignant SPNs for patients along with clinical and FDG-PET data and, secondly, identify patients with malignant nodules and detectable circulating tumor cells to determine whether these cells upstage or augment clinical staging or prognosis post-operatively when compared to FDG-PET alone.

The genotype-directed use of EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients has fundamentally changed the face of the disease with improved response to therapy, preserved quality of life, and prolonged progression-free survival. However, tumors that initially respond become resistant after ~ 1 year (i.e., acquired resistance, AR). The biology of AR is incompletely understood and is largely inferred from pre-clinical models. Our group at Mass General implemented a wide-scale program to perform repeat biopsies on EGFR-mutant patients with AR to first-generation EGFR inhibitors (gefitinib, erlotinib). This translational research paradigm has been instrumental in gaining insight into AR and has led to novel observations such as PIK3CA and BRAF mutations as mechanisms of AR and the abundant frequency of phenotypic changes at the time of AR like small cell lung cancer and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. The repeat biopsy results have directly helped our patients as well, by informing choices about the most relevant clinical trials or alternative treatments. Currently, a new cohort of EGFR TKIs is entering the clinic: 2^nd-generation irreversible pan-HER inhibitors and 3^rd-generation T790M-specific inhibitors. Little is known about how AR develops to these newer therapies or how the biology of EGFR-mutant cancers evolves over time after exposure to sequential EGFR blockers.

Our proposal aims to discover the mechanisms of AR to next-generation EGFR TKIs and to understand the evolution of EGFR-mutant cancers as they face the selective pressure of sequential types of EGFR-directed therapies. To accomplish this we will collaborate across institutions to amass a large number of pre-treatment and post-treatment paired patient biopsies which we will interrogate via allele-specific genotyping as well as whole genome sequencing to define mechanisms of AR. In addition we will utilize an innovative technique of taking tumor tissue directly from a biopsy and deriving patient-specific in vitro and in vivo models in the laboratory. Expansion of these models will yield a larger supply of AR cancer material to aid descriptive and functional research about the biology of AR. In addition, establishment of pre-treatment patient-specific models will allow us to verify whether the mechanism of AR derived in the lab through ex-vivo therapy mirrors the eventual clinical mode of AR.