Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)

The overarching concept guiding our work is that combinations of biomarkers and imaging characteristics will be most robust in predicting which patients with lung nodules should receive an aggressive diagnostic and/or therapeutic approach and which patients should be monitored for nodule stability over time. Our objectives are to improve two biomarker tests that already have shown significant promise-- sputum chromosomal aneusomy by fluorescence in situ hybridization (CA-FISH) and the analysis of multiple serum analytes by a highly multiplexed aptamer-based assay developed by SomaLogic, Inc.-- and then to compare test performance with predictive models based on nodule and patient characteristics. These objectives are based on two separate hypotheses: 1. The current CA-FISH assay panel can be further improved by the development of two sub-panels, one for detection of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (SCC) and the second for the detection of adenocarcinoma of the lung (AC). 2. The current aptamer-based analysis can be further improved by developing separate assays specifically designed for the detection of AC, SCC, K-ras, and EGFR-mutated lung tumors. The assays will then be applied to sputum and blood specimens from the Pittsburgh SPORE Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS) and Colorado SPORE Lung Nodule cohorts, in concert with analysis of the CT characteristics of the corresponding lung nodules, including size, volume, density, location, or airway involvement, to compare test performances and to assess whether combining tests would be valuable.

Cancer therapy needs to be better personalized to individual patients, each of whom carries a unique spectrum of mutations, inherited and/or acquired. One of the best cases for this is lung cancer, where molecular subgrouping patients and targeting their mutations has shown promise. While many groups have searched fervently for additional tumor-acquired mutations that are associated with drug sensitivity and resistance, few have emerged since the discovery of the initial mutations, such as EGFR. In contrast, we have applied our expertise in microRNAs (miRNAs), their biologic function and interaction with oncogenes, and as a result have discovered a new class of inherited, germ-line mutations that appear to have strong potential as companion diagnostics. These mutations are in a relatively unexplored region of the genome, the 3’ untranslated regions (UTRs), once thought to be junk DNA. The first such discovered biomarker, the “KRAS-variant,” is an inherited 3’UTR mutation in KRAS, which affects microRNA (miRNA) binding and KRAS pathway expression, as well as tumor biology. The KRAS-variant was first shown to be a genetic marker for an increased risk of developing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, our data indicate that this variant represents an inherited form of an activated KRAS allele, one of the most important human oncogenes. Several groups have found that the KRAS-variant acts as a biomarker of poor outcomes across multiple cancers, including head and neck cancer, ovarian cancer, and colon cancer. We as well as others have shown that this biomarker is predictive of response to specific cancer treatments, and is not just prognostic of aggressive tumor biology. For example, the KRAS-variant predicts resistance to cisplatin in ovarian and head and neck cancer, resistance to cetuximab in combination with irinotecan chemotherapy, but sensitivity to cetuximab when delivered alone. Furthermore, our preliminary data in this proposal indicate that the KRAS-variant is a powerful companion diagnostic predicting poor response to specific agents, and excellent response to others. These findings, combined with evidence that this allele of KRAS can be targeted using siRNA and miRNA strategies that we have pioneered, leads us to believe that this KRAS-3’UTR mutation is a powerful companion diagnostic in lung cancer, and ultimately may be a critical new target for cancer therapy.

The genotype-directed use of EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients has fundamentally changed the face of the disease with improved response to therapy, preserved quality of life, and prolonged progression-free survival. However, tumors that initially respond become resistant after ~ 1 year (i.e., acquired resistance, AR). The biology of AR is incompletely understood and is largely inferred from pre-clinical models. Our group at Mass General implemented a wide-scale program to perform repeat biopsies on EGFR-mutant patients with AR to first-generation EGFR inhibitors (gefitinib, erlotinib). This translational research paradigm has been instrumental in gaining insight into AR and has led to novel observations such as PIK3CA and BRAF mutations as mechanisms of AR and the abundant frequency of phenotypic changes at the time of AR like small cell lung cancer and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. The repeat biopsy results have directly helped our patients as well, by informing choices about the most relevant clinical trials or alternative treatments. Currently, a new cohort of EGFR TKIs is entering the clinic: 2^nd-generation irreversible pan-HER inhibitors and 3^rd-generation T790M-specific inhibitors. Little is known about how AR develops to these newer therapies or how the biology of EGFR-mutant cancers evolves over time after exposure to sequential EGFR blockers.

Our proposal aims to discover the mechanisms of AR to next-generation EGFR TKIs and to understand the evolution of EGFR-mutant cancers as they face the selective pressure of sequential types of EGFR-directed therapies. To accomplish this we will collaborate across institutions to amass a large number of pre-treatment and post-treatment paired patient biopsies which we will interrogate via allele-specific genotyping as well as whole genome sequencing to define mechanisms of AR. In addition we will utilize an innovative technique of taking tumor tissue directly from a biopsy and deriving patient-specific in vitro and in vivo models in the laboratory. Expansion of these models will yield a larger supply of AR cancer material to aid descriptive and functional research about the biology of AR. In addition, establishment of pre-treatment patient-specific models will allow us to verify whether the mechanism of AR derived in the lab through ex-vivo therapy mirrors the eventual clinical mode of AR.