Funded Projects

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have robust responses to first-line platinum and etoposide; however, most patients suffer rapid and chemoresistant relapse. Even with the recent incorporation of immunotherapy into first-line treatment, the majority of SCLC patients will die of therapeutically resistant disease. This leads to great impetus to develop more effective, mechanism-based treatment strategies in both the initial and subsequent-line treatment settings in patients with this devastating disease.

Our laboratory has previously used multiple patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to define EZH2-mediated SLFN11 gene silencing as a frequent mechanism of acquired chemoresistance in SCLC. Mechanistically, SLFN11 sensitizes cells to chemotherapy-induced replication stress, therefore enhancing the effects of DNA-damaging agents. We found that EZH2 inhibition could re-express SLFN11 and prevent its silencing, which was able to either maintain or re-sensitize SCLC PDXs to chemotherapy, suggesting a potential combinatorial strategy to enhance the effectiveness of current standard chemotherapy. To better understand how epigenetic changes can reverse chemoresistance in a clinical setting involving recurrent SCLC, we aim to conduct a prospective clinical trial with pre-specified tissue and peripheral blood correlative testing. Specifically, on-treatment biopsies and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) will be used to better understand the expected reversal of chemoresistance with the addition of an EZH2 inhibitor. This project will involve testing this broad array of clinical specimens in the well-established translation research program within our lab as well as through pre-existing industry and academic collaborations. Our ultimate goal is to identify more effective therapies for patients with this deadly disease.

Effective immunotherapy options are lacking for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression <50%. One commonly proposed reason for the lack of efficacy of PD-(L)1 agents in these patients is the absence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. This leads to the rationale to develop therapies that could recruit T cells to the site of the tumor, such as in situ vaccination with intratumoral (IT) injection of functional antigen presenting cells. One potential approach to IT vaccination, which could convert tumor sites into a lymph node-like environment, is the injection of autologous dendritic cells (DCs) transduced with an adenoviral (Ad) vector expressing chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21 (CCL21), a chemokine known to (1) facilitate T lymphocyte activation and (2) promote co-localization of T lymphocytes and DCs.

Design

Phase I dose escalation, multi-cohort trial, followed by dose expansion evaluating IT Ad-CCL21-DC plus pembrolizumab. Maximum 24 patients (9-12 escalation + 12 expansion) with stage IV NSCLC will be evaluated who have tumors accessible for IT injection, are treatment naïve, and have PD-L1 expression <50%. Administration of three autologous CCL21-DC IT injections (days 0/21/42) plus pembrolizumab, followed by q3wk pembrolizumab up to 1 year. Dose escalation primary objectives are safety and determination of maximum tolerated dose of IT CCL21-DC when combined with pembrolizumab. Dose expansion primary objective is objective response rate of CCL21-DC plus pembrolizumab. To evaluate the resulting immunological changes (a) mass cytometry (CyTOF) and (b) multiplex immunofluorescence (MIF) will be performed on trial specimens.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has demonstrated profound effects on the anti-tumor immune response and has revolutionized the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While chemotherapy has traditionally been viewed as detrimental to the immune system, recent clinical trials have demonstrated an impressive survival benefit when combining checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy (ICB+chemo) relative to chemotherapy alone. Despite this, many NSCLC patients do not achieve clinical benefit from ICB, even when combined with chemotherapy. The role of tumor mutational burden, and specifically T cells targeting neoantigens derived from these mutations, has been demonstrated in several ICB studies, however these factors have yet to be fully explored in chemotherapy-containing ICB treatment regimens. There is thus an urgent need to understand the effects of ICB+chemo on the anti-tumor immune response and to specifically evaluate how chemotherapy perturbs the phenotype and function of anti-tumor T cells. It is of paramount importance that we understand how PD-1 blockade and chemotherapy synergize to promote anti-tumor immunity in order to better stratify patients most likely to benefit from these treatments. We propose herein to perform the first comprehensive evaluation of the phenotype and function of neoantigen-specific T cells and their dynamics before and after treatment with ICB+chemo relative to ICB alone. The findings from this study will provide a detailed atlas of the immune system dynamics following treatment and will result in the development of an immunometabolic signature that will be correlated with clinical outcome. Importantly, the results of the proposed work will deepen our understanding of the immune response to ICB+chemo and will unravel the mechanisms underlying clinical response in NSCLC patients.

This project describes a 3-year training program for a career as a physician-scientist with the long term goal of establishing a research program within the field of translational thoracic oncology. The applicant is currently an Instructor of Medicine in the Section of Interventional Pulmonology and Thoracic oncology conducting research in developing biomarkers for the treatment selection and monitoring of patients with lung cancer. The research focus of this proposal is to develop molecular markers to better identify the subgroup of patients that will respond to PD1/PDL1 therapies in order to avoid unnecessary toxicities, reduce costs, and enable more appropriate therapies to be delivered. This goal will be accomplished in two complementary specific aims. In Specific Aim 1, a novel approach to acquire fresh tissue samples for immunophenotyping will be utilized to prospectively determine the ability of deep T cell phenotyping and functional assays to predict response to anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy using multi-parametric flow cytometry. In Specific Aim 2, a newly developed technique that enables the quantitative measurement of circulating PDL1 exosomes will be utilized to determine the association of pretreatment and on-treatment exosomal PDL1 expression levels to predict clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving checkpoint blockade. The training component of this proposal includes formal coursework, participation in a rich environment of post-doctoral lectures in thoracic oncology/tumor immunology, acquisition of advanced laboratory techniques, and individual mentoring. This project will take place under the supervision of Dr. Steven Albelda who is the Director of the Thoracic Oncology Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania and Co-Director of the Abramson Cancer Center’s Translational Center of Excellence for Lung Cancer Immunobiology, and Dr. Anil Vachani who is the Director of Clinical Research for the Section of Interventional Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology at Penn. Dr. Albelda and Dr. Vachani have mentored over 100 trainees. In addition, an advisory committee of distinguished scientists will provide experimental assistance, intellectual guidance, and career advice throughout the duration of this award.

The majority of lung cancer patients present with advanced disease that is largely incurable. Efforts to improve the early detection of this disease are critical to decrease lung cancer-related mortality. Low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening in high risk patients has demonstrated reduction in lung cancer related mortality through diagnosis of earlier stage disease at the cost of high false-positive rates and the frequent need for invasive diagnostic testing when indeterminate lung nodules are identified. Detecting tumor specific somatic mutations and/or epigenetic signatures in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents an attractive non-invasive method for identifying early stage lung cancer. However, to realize this promise for lung cancer screening, where ctDNA from small tumors is miniscule, the development of sensitive, specific, and economical ctDNA based assays is critical. 
The bacterial innate immune system consisting of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and their associated endonucleases (CRISPR-Cas) are specifically adapted to recognize foreign nucleic acids. The recent identification and diagnostic adaptation of certain classes of CRISPR-Cas systems, such as CRISPR-Cas12a and -Cas13a, offer unique platforms on which to develop sensitive, specific, and economical assays for the detection of ctDNA. The goal of the current project is to develop CRISPR-Cas12a and -Cas13a based ctDNA assays that can sensitively detect somatic cancer mutations and aberrant promoter hypermethylation often found in lung cancer patients and to validate these assays in plasma samples of patients with early stage NSCLC and in discriminating between benign and malignant nodules identified by low-dose CT screening studies. 

Several ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are available for the treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but resistance to all ALK TKIs (including crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) has been reported and occurs through a variety of mechanisms. Once patients develop resistance to available ALK inhibitors, they are typically treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy rather than immunotherapy since response rates to PD-1 pathway inhibitors in this population are very low. However, our work in mouse models of ALK-positive NSCLC has demonstrated that a vaccine generated against the rearranged portion of ALK can both prevent the development of ALK-positive tumors and also more effectively treat them once they arise. In addition, we have recently found evidence of an anti-ALK immune response in patients, as a subset of them generate spontaneous ALK autoantibodies.

To more deeply characterize anti-ALK immunologic responses in patients, we propose (Aim 1) to determine if the presence of anti-ALK antibodies correlates with progression-free and overall survival among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, and (Aim 2) to directly identify and validate antigenic ALK peptides in different HLA-haplotype backgrounds. Antigenic peptides that are identified through these studies will serve as the basis for a therapeutic ALK peptide vaccine clinical trial, for which funding has been secured independently.

ALK rearrangements define a distinct molecular subset of NSCLC and confer sensitivity to treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These agents have produced dramatic improvements in clinical outcomes among ALK-rearranged (ALK+) patients, yet acquired resistance remains a major challenge. Thus, there is an urgent need for alternative therapeutic approaches for this disease. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting negative regulators of the immune response (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1) have emerged as powerful new therapies in NSCLC. In preliminary analyses, we and others have observed that ALK+ lung cancers are generally less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We hypothesize that distinct immune-based strategies may therefore be needed for ALK+ lung cancers. To inform these strategies, we will investigate 1) tumor-intrinsic factors associated with immunogenicity in ALK+ tumors (e.g., neoantigens, tumor mutation burden), 2) tumor-immune cell interactions (e.g., PD-L1 expression, alternative checkpoint expression, antigen presentation), and 3) endogenous T cell responses against ALK in the peripheral blood. Together, these studies may lay the groundwork for development of biomarkers informing optimal delivery of PD-(L)1 therapy in ALK+ lung cancers, while also promoting the development of novel combinations and approaches, including autologous cellular therapies directed against ALK.

Targeted therapies, such as ALK inhibitors, represent a major advance in the treatment of lung cancer patients with specific oncogenic drivers. However, these patients relapse due to acquired or intrinsic resistance to these agents. While targeting immnoevasive pathways, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown efficacy in a subset of lung cancer patients who have progressed on other therapies, the response rate in ALK-positive lung cancer to these agents is very low, underscoring the need to identify other potential regulators of the anti-tumor immune response. The complement pathway is a component of the innate immune response, which regulates the adaptive immune system. Complement activation, initiated through multiple pathways, leads to a series of proteolytic cascades that generate inflammatory mediators designated as anaphylatoxins (C3a, C5a).

Our laboratory has employed an immunocompetent orthotopic model of lung cancer progression, where lung cancer cells are implanted into the lungs of syngeneic mice. To study pathways regulating progression of ALK-positive lung cancer, we have developed a panel of murine lung cancer cell lines with the oncogenic driver EML4/ALK. Using both genetic and pharmacological approaches we have demonstrated that while these tumors are resistant to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy, they are strongly inhibited by blocking the complement pathway. This project will define the mechanisms of complement activation, and the cellular and molecular mechanisms whereby complement inhibition blocks ALK-positive tumor progression. Studies will test a panel of complement inhibitors targeting different steps in the complement cascade and validate complement activation in human ALK-positive lung tumors.

Side effects of immune checkpoint therapies, termed immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), are unique and generally secondary to inflammatory tissue damage. The onset and duration of irAEs are unpredictable and predisposing factors for individuals to develop irAEs remains unclear. Some irAEs that emerge with immune checkpoint blockade share clinical features of autoimmune conditions. Preexisting auto-reactive antibodies and their contribution to immune side effects with immunotherapy and radiation have not been defined. This maybe particularly relevant to immune related adverse effects, since recent studies suggest almost 8-9% of the US population carries autoimmune diseases and 26% of healthy individuals have strong IgG humoral responses to variety of self-antigens. For the proposed study, we will use a set of longitudinally collected patient blood samples from a clinical trial which evaluates the clinical activity of combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without local consolidative therapy (stereotactic body irradiation) 

We plan to follow preexisting auto-reactive antibodies, baseline T and B cell receptor clonality and their temporal dynamics for combination immune checkpoint therapy with or without radiation therapy and correlate these findings with irAEs and response to therapy.    

Immune-targeted agents have generated antitumor responses that are transforming cancer therapeutics in various tumors types including lung cancer. Despite the impressive responses observed, the majority of patients eventually experience therapeutic resistance after an initial response. Considering the increased cost to patients and health systems both financially and in terms of time spent in management of immune-related adverse effects it has become clear that success of immuno-oncology approaches depends on choosing patient populations most likely to benefit. Our proposed research addresses the urgent unmet clinical need to understand the underlying biology of response and develop molecular assays of response and resistance to immune targeted agents. We propose comprehensive genome-wide analyses of tumors and cell-free circulating DNA to examine how cancer genomes change during immune checkpoint blockade. Our approach is focused on discovery of mechanisms of resistance using a multidimensional strategy that combines comprehensive genomic analyses with functional assays of autologous T-cell reactivity. The underlying premise of this proposal is that through our comprehensive molecular analyses, we will identify changes in the genomic landscape of tumors during immune checkpoint blockade that mediate emergence of primary and acquired resistance to these therapies. Unravelling the genomic mechanisms through which cancer adapts to evade anti-tumor immune responses will be critical for future development of tailored cancer immunotherapy strategies. We envision that the results of the proposed research will be used to develop patient-specific immunotherapy approaches in lung cancer and will launch investigator-initiated clinical trials at Hopkins and other institutions.

Background: Osimertinib and other “third-generation” EGFR TKIs effectively overcome T790M-mediated resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer, but our understanding of acquired resistance in this setting remains limited. Importantly, the intrinsic heterogeneity of resistant cancers leads to clinical challenges. We hypothesize that in-depth study of 3rd-generation TKI resistance and the impact of genetic heterogeneity on treatment response will lead to improved therapeutic options and clinical outcomes. Study Design: We will analyze tumor biopsies, ctDNA and autopsy specimens using a variety of techniques such as next-generation sequencing, digital droplet PCR and whole exome sequencing to characterize heterogeneity in resistant cancers. In addition, we will run a prospective clinical trial to test a novel therapeutic combination designed to minimize heterogeneity and delay progression. On-treatment biopsies and ctDNA collection will be used to study how resistance develops. Impact: This project will leverage our broad array of clinical specimens, well-established translational research program and preexisting industry and academic collaborations to characterize the heterogeneity of resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. We hope to illuminate clinical and biologic implications of heterogeneity, with the ultimate goal of identifying more effective therapies for patients.

Statement of the Problem: Cancer develops in a sequenced manner. Patches of lung cells gain the ability to multiply faster than their neighboring normal cells by acquiring mutations. These patches of cells are called “premalignant lesions" (PMLs). Some of these lesions may eventually become cancer. Knowledge about how some PMLs may develop into lung cancer is central to developing tools for Cancer Interception—interrupting the cancer development process and blocking progression to advanced metastatic disease. However, we lack effective lung cancer interception approaches due to our incomplete understanding of the earliest molecular events associated with the development of lung cancer, as well as the challenge in developing personalized tools for early detection and prevention.

Proposed Solution: The Dream Team will use a holistic approach to understand the genetics, immunology, radiological (imaging) profile, and treatment response of patients who show evidence of abnormal lung tissue that puts them at high risk to develop lung cancer. The Team has access to unique groups of patient populations (adenocarcinoma—ADC and squamous cell carcinoma—SCC) with signs of lung cancer risk, and has assembled a collection of blood and tissue specimens from these individuals. The main objective of the Team is to understand how lung cancer develops and test methods that will block the development of cancer. Their three-pronged approach to solve this problem will include:

• Creation of a molecular pre-cancer genome atlas (PCGA) of the lung with the goal of identifying which types of precancerous lung tissue require aggressive treatment and which treatments will block the development of these abnormal lesions to invasive lung cancer.
• Development of two diagnostic tools that can be directly applied in the clinic for simple, yet accurate, detection of early lung cancer: 1) the use of nasal swabs, blood tests, and imaging to confirm whether lung abnormalities found on chest imaging are lung cancer or benign lung disease. 2) blood tests that can identify patients at the earliest stages of lung cancer recurrence, thus enabling their timely and effective intervention with therapies such as those that boost the immune system.
• Development of tests to identify which individuals are most likely to benefit from a number of treatment strategies to intercept lung cancer, including emerging immunotherapies.

Statement of the Problem: Currently, low dose CT (LDCT) screening for lung cancer is recommended for high-risk individuals, defined as current or former smokers (quit within the past 15 years) with a 30-or-more pack-year smoking history, 55 to 74 years of age, and with no evidence of lung cancer. However, uptake of LDCT screening has been impeded by high rates of false-positive results, which in turn add significant physical and emotional stress to patients as well as additional healthcare costs. Since LDCT is now commonly available, lung nodules detected in LDCT scans are plentiful, but imprecise guidelines for care make it a challenge to ensure quality follow-up and expedited diagnoses for those with lung cancer. Furthermore, screening is not available for those who don’t meet the screening criteria (younger age or low smoking history) when they are the exact population among whom lung cancer rates are rising.

Proposed Solution: Leveraging expertise of academic research centers (Massachusetts General Hospital, Broad Institute, and Stanford University) and a non-profit managed-care consortium (Kaiser Permanente), the Dream Team will develop a test called the Lung Cancer Interception Assay (LCIA) to complement LDCT screening.

The proposal is novel in that it will develop complex computational algorithms to combine high-sensitivity/high-accuracy blood-based molecular biomarkers with image-based biomarkers to create the  LCIA assay. At the end of the award period, a streamlined product, the LCIA, will be ready to use in population-level definitive trials for the early detection of lung cancer.

One of the challenges for early detection and prevention of lung squamous cell carcinoma is the lack of understanding of the molecular and cellular changes that cause initiation and progression of this disease. Airway premalignant lesions are the precursors of lung squamous cell carcinoma and can be detected and monitored by autofluorescence bronchoscopy. However, many of these lesions will regress without clinical intervention, and only a subset will progress to invasive carcinoma. The goal of this study is to characterize the landscape of somatic mutations in airway premalignant lesions and to develop an early detection biomarker using targeted DNA sequencing that can predict risk of lesion progression. Ultra-deep whole-exome sequencing will be performed on a previously collected cohort of airway premalignant lesions from high-risk smokers that have been sampled over time, characterized histologically, and classified into those that are stable, regress, or progress. Significantly mutated genes, recurrent copy number changes, and mutational signatures will be identified, and a determination will be made whether they are associated with lesion histology or progression or regression status. Finally, the findings from this study will be combined with the driver genes from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to build a targeted DNA sequencing panel. This panel will serve as a rapid and relatively inexpensive method for monitoring premalignant lesions from patients over time and can be used in a clinical trial to assess the ability of autofluorescence bronchoscopy in combination with molecular profiling to stratify patients and serve as a companion diagnostic in chemoprevention trials.

Inadequate biopsy yield is a significant limitation to early lung cancer diagnosis and is a two-pronged problem: (1) Early-stage lung cancers are not adequately targeted during biopsy due to their small size and (2) even if a nodule is adequately targeted, often there is insufficient tumor in the biopsy to make a definitive diagnosis and/or accomplish all diagnostic testing for patient care. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a high-resolution imaging modality that provides virtual visualization of tissue volumes orders of magnitude larger than biopsy without tissue removal. Dr. Hariri’s group has developed OCT catheters compatible with standard bronchoscopes and demonstrated that OCT can identify lung nodules and assess pathologic features of lung cancer with high sensitivity/specificity. This project’s aims are to dramatically improve diagnostic capability in lung cancer using large volume OCT to provide (1) virtual intra-procedural evaluation in real-time (VIPER) of biopsy site location and 2) large volume virtual optical biopsy for subsequent pathology diagnosis as a complement to tissue biopsy. In Aim 1, they will assess if in vivo OCT VIPER biopsy assessment increases tumor yield on bronchoscopic biopsy in a powered, blinded clinical study. In Aim 2, they will use the data obtained in Aim 1 to determine the diagnostic accuracy of large volume OCT optical biopsy with tissue biopsy as compared to tissue biopsy alone. This project will result in clinical translation of a powerful, robust new optical bronchoscopy tool that could reduce unnecessary diagnostic procedures, eliminate delayed diagnoses, provide earlier intervention, and improve patient morbidity/mortality.