Targeted therapy

The genotype-directed use of EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients has fundamentally changed the face of the disease with improved response to therapy, preserved quality of life, and prolonged progression-free survival. However, tumors that initially respond become resistant after ~ 1 year (i.e., acquired resistance, AR). The biology of AR is incompletely understood and is largely inferred from pre-clinical models. Our group at Mass General implemented a wide-scale program to perform repeat biopsies on EGFR-mutant patients with AR to first-generation EGFR inhibitors (gefitinib, erlotinib). This translational research paradigm has been instrumental in gaining insight into AR and has led to novel observations such as PIK3CA and BRAF mutations as mechanisms of AR and the abundant frequency of phenotypic changes at the time of AR like small cell lung cancer and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. The repeat biopsy results have directly helped our patients as well, by informing choices about the most relevant clinical trials or alternative treatments. Currently, a new cohort of EGFR TKIs is entering the clinic: 2^nd-generation irreversible pan-HER inhibitors and 3^rd-generation T790M-specific inhibitors. Little is known about how AR develops to these newer therapies or how the biology of EGFR-mutant cancers evolves over time after exposure to sequential EGFR blockers.

Our proposal aims to discover the mechanisms of AR to next-generation EGFR TKIs and to understand the evolution of EGFR-mutant cancers as they face the selective pressure of sequential types of EGFR-directed therapies. To accomplish this we will collaborate across institutions to amass a large number of pre-treatment and post-treatment paired patient biopsies which we will interrogate via allele-specific genotyping as well as whole genome sequencing to define mechanisms of AR. In addition we will utilize an innovative technique of taking tumor tissue directly from a biopsy and deriving patient-specific in vitro and in vivo models in the laboratory. Expansion of these models will yield a larger supply of AR cancer material to aid descriptive and functional research about the biology of AR. In addition, establishment of pre-treatment patient-specific models will allow us to verify whether the mechanism of AR derived in the lab through ex-vivo therapy mirrors the eventual clinical mode of AR.

A significant fraction of NSCLC have mutant KRAS which predicts poor response to cytotoxic therapy and portends a poor prognosis. Despite the discovery of the first mutation in the KRAS oncogene in NSCLC over two decades ago, there are no current therapies targeting this critical oncogene. In this proposal we explore a novel and exciting therapeutic strategy to target KRAS-mutant NSCLC through the combination of Hsp90 and mTOR inhibition. We have preclinical evidence suggesting that the combination of ganetespib and an mTOR inhibitor may be an effective therapeutic strategy for patients with KRAS- mutant NSCLC. In Aim 1, we will define resistance mechanisms to single-agent ganetespib in KRAS- mutant NSCLC. The identification of resistance mechanisms to single-agent ganetespib will reveal novel pathways that we can then target in combination with an Hsp90 inhibitor. In Aim 2, we will test the hypothesis that activation of the mTOR pathway through alterations in STK11 or PI3KCA mutations will predict response to the combination. Finally, in Aim 3 we will translate our studies to the clinic in a phase I/II trial of the combination of ganetespib and an mTOR inhibitor in patients with advanced KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Importantly, we will have correlative studies looking at response in subpopulations of KRAS-mutant tumors that are hyperactive for the mTOR pathway (STK11, PIK3CA mutations). This translational approach will allow us to identify biomarkers that we can use to effectively target this combination to the patients with greatest chance to benefit from this therapy.