Metastatic

The current standard of care for ALK rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is targeted therapy with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) which bind within the kinase domain of ALK. Due to the development of ALK resistance mutations or bypass activation of parallel or downstream signal pathways, patients inevitably relapse. Even with the introduction of second or third generation TKIs, median overall survival has been estimated to be 6.8 years . Recent advances in immunotherapy have demonstrated progress in lung cancer treatment. However, a majority of ALK positive NSCLC patients have yet to realize the benefits from checkpoint inhibitors or CAR-T cell therapies due to primary resistance or toxicity. Therefore, the development of new treatments for ALK-rearranged NSCLC is an area of critical need. We believe that an effective assault on ALK-driven tumors requires the implementation of creative strategies that allow us to expand our arsenal of drugs to target ALK beyond its kinase domain. To meet this challenge, we have developed and employed cysteine druggability mapping (CDM), a method to define the landscape of inhibitor-protein interactions in a cancer cell. CDM identifies cysteines that can bind to covalent drug-like molecules which serve as early prototypes on which to base cancer drug development programs.
Cysteine-reactive covalent inhibitors have already emerged as an effective approach to targeting protein kinases. Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) TKI covalent inhibitor, overcomes EGFR T790M resistance mutations following treatment with EGFR TKI, demonstrating significant improvements over standard EGFR TKIs when used as first line therapy. Importantly, targeting cysteines with covalent inhibitors massively expands the number of proteins which are targetable with small molecule inhibitors, including many targets previously considered undruggable.

We will use ALK fusion positive cancer cell lines, together with tumor tissues from patients who developed resistance mechanisms, to generate druggable cysteine profiles by CDM. Druggable proteins specific to ALK fusion positive samples, including EML4-ALK itself, will be prioritized in our screening for protein degraders from a library of over 2,500 advanced cysteine reactive compounds. After screening, we will assess the specificity of the compound hits and validate their anti-tumor activity using ALK fusion positive cell lines and patient derived ALK TKI-resistant cell lines. We consider the use of the novel, cutting-edge cysteine targeting technology to screen for potent therapeutic compounds as a valuable proposition to improve management of patients with ALK positive lung cancer, with the goal of transforming this cancer into a chronic condition.

With the development of increasingly potent and selective ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), resistance is commonly mediated by ALK-independent mechanisms, such as bypass pathway activation. As bypass signaling dependencies vary across ALK-rearranged (ALK+) lung cancers, a multipronged approach is needed to broadly suppress potential bypass signals. We have identified MET activation in 20% of ALK+ tumors that are resistant to next-generation ALK TKIs. In preclinical studies, dual ALK/MET blockade re-sensitized MET-amplified ALK+ tumors to lorlatinib. MEK and SHP2 have recently been identified as important effector proteins downstream of several bypass signaling pathways. In ALK+ models harboring diverse bypass signals, pairing an ALK TKI with either a MEK or SHP2 inhibitor demonstrated broad anti-proliferative activity. Based on these findings, we will conduct a clinical trial to evaluate lorlatinib in combination with a MET, MEK, or SHP2 inhibitor for patients with ALK+ lung cancers with ALK-independent resistance. Serial tumor biopsies will be analyzed to characterize molecular determinants of response to combination therapy and identify expression changes induced by treatment. This innovative multi-arm trial will also assess whether dynamics of genetic alterations in plasma can be used to guide intensification of treatment from monotherapy to early combination therapy for patients who have not yet developed resistance to ALK-directed therapy. Collectively, the studies in this grant strive to develop diverse strategies for overcoming ALK-independent resistance, a heterogeneous molecular entity that undermines efficacy of current ALK therapeutics.

Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are available for the treatment of ALK+ NSCLC, but resistance to all ALK TKIs (including alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib) has been reported and occurs through a variety of mechanisms. Once patients develop resistance to available ALK inhibitors, they are typically treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy rather than immunotherapy since response rates to PD-1 pathway inhibitors in this population are very low. However, our work in mouse models of ALK+ NSCLC has demonstrated that a vaccine generated against the rearranged portion of ALK can both prevent the development of ALK+ tumors and also more effectively treat them once they arise. We have also recently found evidence for anti-ALK immune responses in patients, as a subset of them generate spontaneous ALK autoantibodies.

We aim to translate our preclinical findings to a first-in-human clinical trial. Aim 1 will test the safety and efficacy of a novel ALK vaccine + an amphiphilic CpG toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant, administered in combination with an ALK TKI or PD-1 inhibitor in patients with TKI-resistant ALK-positive NSCLC. In Aim 2, using liquid chromatography data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry, we will directly identify antigenic ALK peptides presented by MHC molecules on the surface of cancer cells from tumor biopsies obtained on trial participants. In Aim 3, we will study pre- and post-vaccination anti-ALK T-cell responses among trial participants by analyzing peripheral leukocytes and intratumoral immune cells. The overarching goal is to develop a vaccine that stimulates patients’ immune cells to recognize and eliminate ALK+ tumors.

KRAS mutations are the most common activating mutation in lung cancer and are identified in 25-30% of cases of lung adenocarcinoma. The clinical activity of molecularly targeted therapy in KRAS mutant lung cancer has been limited, as most prior approaches focused on downstream targets of the MAPK pathway, an approach which was largely ineffective. KRAS G12C is the most common subtype of activating KRAS mutation in NSCLC. Identification of a binding pocket of KRAS G12C enabled the development of covalent inhibitors (Ostrem et al. Nature, 2013), which selectively bind to the mutant cysteine and spare wild type or other mutant KRAS proteins (hereafter referred to as G12Ci). These drugs bind only to GDP-bound (i.e. inactive) KRAS G12C and trap the oncoprotein in its inactive state by preventing nucleotide exchange (Lito et al. Science, 2016). Of this new class of agents, two drugs (MRTX849 and AMG510) have demonstrated efficacy in early phase clinical trials, representing a remarkable breakthrough in the management of KRAS G12C mutant lung cancer. Acknowledging the limited number of patients treated thus far, response rates of 40-50% have been reported, demonstrating clinical activity far superior to prior molecularly targeted approaches for the management of KRAS mutant lung cancer. Despite this major advance it is clear that resistance to therapy, both primary and acquired, will remain a challenge and may in part be due to upstream receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance to this new class of therapy is of paramount importance to improve the efficacy and durability of response, and for identifying rational combinatorial therapies for future clinical trials.

This project describes a 3-year training program for a career as a physician-scientist with the long term goal of establishing a research program within the field of translational thoracic oncology. The applicant is currently an Instructor of Medicine in the Section of Interventional Pulmonology and Thoracic oncology conducting research in developing biomarkers for the treatment selection and monitoring of patients with lung cancer. The research focus of this proposal is to develop molecular markers to better identify the subgroup of patients that will respond to PD1/PDL1 therapies in order to avoid unnecessary toxicities, reduce costs, and enable more appropriate therapies to be delivered. This goal will be accomplished in two complementary specific aims. In Specific Aim 1, a novel approach to acquire fresh tissue samples for immunophenotyping will be utilized to prospectively determine the ability of deep T cell phenotyping and functional assays to predict response to anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy using multi-parametric flow cytometry. In Specific Aim 2, a newly developed technique that enables the quantitative measurement of circulating PDL1 exosomes will be utilized to determine the association of pretreatment and on-treatment exosomal PDL1 expression levels to predict clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving checkpoint blockade. The training component of this proposal includes formal coursework, participation in a rich environment of post-doctoral lectures in thoracic oncology/tumor immunology, acquisition of advanced laboratory techniques, and individual mentoring. This project will take place under the supervision of Dr. Steven Albelda who is the Director of the Thoracic Oncology Laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania and Co-Director of the Abramson Cancer Center’s Translational Center of Excellence for Lung Cancer Immunobiology, and Dr. Anil Vachani who is the Director of Clinical Research for the Section of Interventional Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology at Penn. Dr. Albelda and Dr. Vachani have mentored over 100 trainees. In addition, an advisory committee of distinguished scientists will provide experimental assistance, intellectual guidance, and career advice throughout the duration of this award.

Targeted therapies, such as ALK inhibitors, represent a major advance in the treatment of lung cancer patients with specific oncogenic drivers. However, these patients relapse due to acquired or intrinsic resistance to these agents. While targeting immnoevasive pathways, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, have shown efficacy in a subset of lung cancer patients who have progressed on other therapies, the response rate in ALK-positive lung cancer to these agents is very low, underscoring the need to identify other potential regulators of the anti-tumor immune response. The complement pathway is a component of the innate immune response, which regulates the adaptive immune system. Complement activation, initiated through multiple pathways, leads to a series of proteolytic cascades that generate inflammatory mediators designated as anaphylatoxins (C3a, C5a).

Our laboratory has employed an immunocompetent orthotopic model of lung cancer progression, where lung cancer cells are implanted into the lungs of syngeneic mice. To study pathways regulating progression of ALK-positive lung cancer, we have developed a panel of murine lung cancer cell lines with the oncogenic driver EML4/ALK. Using both genetic and pharmacological approaches we have demonstrated that while these tumors are resistant to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy, they are strongly inhibited by blocking the complement pathway. This project will define the mechanisms of complement activation, and the cellular and molecular mechanisms whereby complement inhibition blocks ALK-positive tumor progression. Studies will test a panel of complement inhibitors targeting different steps in the complement cascade and validate complement activation in human ALK-positive lung tumors.

ALK rearrangements define a distinct molecular subset of NSCLC and confer sensitivity to treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These agents have produced dramatic improvements in clinical outcomes among ALK-rearranged (ALK+) patients, yet acquired resistance remains a major challenge. Thus, there is an urgent need for alternative therapeutic approaches for this disease. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting negative regulators of the immune response (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1) have emerged as powerful new therapies in NSCLC. In preliminary analyses, we and others have observed that ALK+ lung cancers are generally less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We hypothesize that distinct immune-based strategies may therefore be needed for ALK+ lung cancers. To inform these strategies, we will investigate 1) tumor-intrinsic factors associated with immunogenicity in ALK+ tumors (e.g., neoantigens, tumor mutation burden), 2) tumor-immune cell interactions (e.g., PD-L1 expression, alternative checkpoint expression, antigen presentation), and 3) endogenous T cell responses against ALK in the peripheral blood. Together, these studies may lay the groundwork for development of biomarkers informing optimal delivery of PD-(L)1 therapy in ALK+ lung cancers, while also promoting the development of novel combinations and approaches, including autologous cellular therapies directed against ALK.

Several ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are available for the treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but resistance to all ALK TKIs (including crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) has been reported and occurs through a variety of mechanisms. Once patients develop resistance to available ALK inhibitors, they are typically treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy rather than immunotherapy since response rates to PD-1 pathway inhibitors in this population are very low. However, our work in mouse models of ALK-positive NSCLC has demonstrated that a vaccine generated against the rearranged portion of ALK can both prevent the development of ALK-positive tumors and also more effectively treat them once they arise. In addition, we have recently found evidence of an anti-ALK immune response in patients, as a subset of them generate spontaneous ALK autoantibodies.

To more deeply characterize anti-ALK immunologic responses in patients, we propose (Aim 1) to determine if the presence of anti-ALK antibodies correlates with progression-free and overall survival among patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, and (Aim 2) to directly identify and validate antigenic ALK peptides in different HLA-haplotype backgrounds. Antigenic peptides that are identified through these studies will serve as the basis for a therapeutic ALK peptide vaccine clinical trial, for which funding has been secured independently.

Statement of the Problem: Currently, low dose CT (LDCT) screening for lung cancer is recommended for high-risk individuals, defined as current or former smokers (quit within the past 15 years) with a 30-or-more pack-year smoking history, 55 to 74 years of age, and with no evidence of lung cancer. However, uptake of LDCT screening has been impeded by high rates of false-positive results, which in turn add significant physical and emotional stress to patients as well as additional healthcare costs. Since LDCT is now commonly available, lung nodules detected in LDCT scans are plentiful, but imprecise guidelines for care make it a challenge to ensure quality follow-up and expedited diagnoses for those with lung cancer. Furthermore, screening is not available for those who don’t meet the screening criteria (younger age or low smoking history) when they are the exact population among whom lung cancer rates are rising.

Proposed Solution: Leveraging expertise of academic research centers (Massachusetts General Hospital, Broad Institute, and Stanford University) and a non-profit managed-care consortium (Kaiser Permanente), the Dream Team will develop a test called the Lung Cancer Interception Assay (LCIA) to complement LDCT screening.

The proposal is novel in that it will develop complex computational algorithms to combine high-sensitivity/high-accuracy blood-based molecular biomarkers with image-based biomarkers to create the  LCIA assay. At the end of the award period, a streamlined product, the LCIA, will be ready to use in population-level definitive trials for the early detection of lung cancer.

Side effects of immune checkpoint therapies, termed immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), are unique and generally secondary to inflammatory tissue damage. The onset and duration of irAEs are unpredictable and predisposing factors for individuals to develop irAEs remains unclear. Some irAEs that emerge with immune checkpoint blockade share clinical features of autoimmune conditions. Preexisting auto-reactive antibodies and their contribution to immune side effects with immunotherapy and radiation have not been defined. This maybe particularly relevant to immune related adverse effects, since recent studies suggest almost 8-9% of the US population carries autoimmune diseases and 26% of healthy individuals have strong IgG humoral responses to variety of self-antigens. For the proposed study, we will use a set of longitudinally collected patient blood samples from a clinical trial which evaluates the clinical activity of combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without local consolidative therapy (stereotactic body irradiation) 

We plan to follow preexisting auto-reactive antibodies, baseline T and B cell receptor clonality and their temporal dynamics for combination immune checkpoint therapy with or without radiation therapy and correlate these findings with irAEs and response to therapy.