Acquired resistance

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a common, aggressive, and exceptionally lethal malignancy that is usually metastatic at the time of diagnosis. Newly diagnosed SCLC is remarkably sensitive to chemotherapy, with response rates of over 60% to cisplatin and etoposide even in patients with extensive-stage disease. These chemotherapy responses are often both rapid and deep, but are never curative: extensive-stage disease recurs universally, in most cases within a few months after completion of first-line therapy. Recurrent SCLC is remarkably refractory to treatment. The median overall survival of patients with extensive-stage SCLC is about nine months from the time of initial diagnosis, and the 5-year survival is less than 1%. Defining the basis of acquired chemotherapy resistance in SCLC could have clear and important ramifications for clinical management of this disease. Targeting the key determinants of acquired chemoresistance could be integrated into first-line treatment, and/or could drive rational targeted therapeutic studies for recurrent disease. We now have in hand multiple technical approaches that could comprehensively define the genomic and epigenetic changes that drive acquired resistance in SCLC. In this award application, we propose two parallel approaches to analyzing acquired resistance in SCLC: analysis of primary samples and patient-derived xenografts before and after acquired resistance.

The ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib has demonstrated significant activity in patients with ALK+ lung cancer, but its efficacy is limited by the development of acquired resistance. One potential resistance mechanism involves activation of the EGFR and HER2 kinases. This activation occurs in the absence of EGFR/HER2 mutation or amplification, suggesting an alternative mechanism for up-regulation of these kinases. We discovered a novel association between ALK and the EGFR/HER2 negative regulator, MIG-6. MIG-6 is known to inhibit EGFR/HER2 kinase activity through direct binding. However, to date, there is no known link between ALK and MIG-6. In our preliminary data, we demonstrate that MIG-6 protein levels decrease after ALK TKI treatment, a process abrogated by addition of a proteasome inhibitor. Furthermore, MIG-6 transcript and total protein levels are decreased in ALK+/TKI resistant compared to isogenic ALK+/TKI sensitive cells. The decline in MIG-6 correlates with an increase in EGFR and HER2 protein levels in the resistant cells. Based upon these data, we hypothesize that ALK serves as an upstream regulator of MIG-6, and that MIG-6 suppression drives EGFR/HER2 activation in the ALK TKI resistant state. To test this hypothesis, we propose to: 1) elucidate the molecular mechanisms whereby ALK regulates MIG-6 expression, and 2) determine the mechanisms whereby MIG-6 contributes to EGFR/HER2 pathway activation in TKI-resistant ALK+ lung cancer cells. The proposed studies may lead to strategies that augment or restore expression of MIG-6 and therefore will represent a novel therapeutic approach for patients with acquired resistance to ALK inhibitor therapy.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer with dismal survival rates. New strategies are urgently needed to improve clinical outcomes for SCLC patients. Recently, we identified high expression of the DNA-repair protein poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) in SCLC cell lines and tumors through a large-scale, proteomic profiling project. In vitro data from our group has shown that PARP inhibitors have single-agent activity in SCLC and potentiate the activity of chemotherapies that work by inducing DNA damage. Based on these results, we are conducting an investigator-initiated, Phase II clinical trial of the oral alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) with or without the PARP inhibitor ABT-888 for patients with relapsed SCLC. We hypothesize that PARP1’s action as an E2F1 co-activator contributes to the overexpression of multiple E2F1-regulated DNA repair proteins, resulting in resistance to chemotherapy. Thus, targeting PARP1 will decrease expression of E2F1-regulated DNA repair proteins, as well as directly inhibit PARP-mediated DNA repair, resulting in decreased cell viability and improved clinical outcomes in patients treated with TMZ and the PARP inhibitor. In the studies proposed here, we will test in vitro and in vivo sensitivity of SCLC to ABT-888 and TMZ, alone and in combination, and develop predictive biomarkers of response that will be tested in our Phase II clinical trial. The ultimate goal of this laboratory and clinical research is to develop PARP inhibitors as a novel therapy for SCLC.

Cancer therapy needs to be better personalized to individual patients, each of whom carries a unique spectrum of mutations, inherited and/or acquired. One of the best cases for this is lung cancer, where molecular subgrouping patients and targeting their mutations has shown promise. While many groups have searched fervently for additional tumor-acquired mutations that are associated with drug sensitivity and resistance, few have emerged since the discovery of the initial mutations, such as EGFR. In contrast, we have applied our expertise in microRNAs (miRNAs), their biologic function and interaction with oncogenes, and as a result have discovered a new class of inherited, germ-line mutations that appear to have strong potential as companion diagnostics. These mutations are in a relatively unexplored region of the genome, the 3’ untranslated regions (UTRs), once thought to be junk DNA. The first such discovered biomarker, the “KRAS-variant,” is an inherited 3’UTR mutation in KRAS, which affects microRNA (miRNA) binding and KRAS pathway expression, as well as tumor biology. The KRAS-variant was first shown to be a genetic marker for an increased risk of developing non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, our data indicate that this variant represents an inherited form of an activated KRAS allele, one of the most important human oncogenes. Several groups have found that the KRAS-variant acts as a biomarker of poor outcomes across multiple cancers, including head and neck cancer, ovarian cancer, and colon cancer. We as well as others have shown that this biomarker is predictive of response to specific cancer treatments, and is not just prognostic of aggressive tumor biology. For example, the KRAS-variant predicts resistance to cisplatin in ovarian and head and neck cancer, resistance to cetuximab in combination with irinotecan chemotherapy, but sensitivity to cetuximab when delivered alone. Furthermore, our preliminary data in this proposal indicate that the KRAS-variant is a powerful companion diagnostic predicting poor response to specific agents, and excellent response to others. These findings, combined with evidence that this allele of KRAS can be targeted using siRNA and miRNA strategies that we have pioneered, leads us to believe that this KRAS-3’UTR mutation is a powerful companion diagnostic in lung cancer, and ultimately may be a critical new target for cancer therapy.

The genotype-directed use of EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients has fundamentally changed the face of the disease with improved response to therapy, preserved quality of life, and prolonged progression-free survival. However, tumors that initially respond become resistant after ~ 1 year (i.e., acquired resistance, AR). The biology of AR is incompletely understood and is largely inferred from pre-clinical models. Our group at Mass General implemented a wide-scale program to perform repeat biopsies on EGFR-mutant patients with AR to first-generation EGFR inhibitors (gefitinib, erlotinib). This translational research paradigm has been instrumental in gaining insight into AR and has led to novel observations such as PIK3CA and BRAF mutations as mechanisms of AR and the abundant frequency of phenotypic changes at the time of AR like small cell lung cancer and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. The repeat biopsy results have directly helped our patients as well, by informing choices about the most relevant clinical trials or alternative treatments. Currently, a new cohort of EGFR TKIs is entering the clinic: 2^nd-generation irreversible pan-HER inhibitors and 3^rd-generation T790M-specific inhibitors. Little is known about how AR develops to these newer therapies or how the biology of EGFR-mutant cancers evolves over time after exposure to sequential EGFR blockers.

Our proposal aims to discover the mechanisms of AR to next-generation EGFR TKIs and to understand the evolution of EGFR-mutant cancers as they face the selective pressure of sequential types of EGFR-directed therapies. To accomplish this we will collaborate across institutions to amass a large number of pre-treatment and post-treatment paired patient biopsies which we will interrogate via allele-specific genotyping as well as whole genome sequencing to define mechanisms of AR. In addition we will utilize an innovative technique of taking tumor tissue directly from a biopsy and deriving patient-specific in vitro and in vivo models in the laboratory. Expansion of these models will yield a larger supply of AR cancer material to aid descriptive and functional research about the biology of AR. In addition, establishment of pre-treatment patient-specific models will allow us to verify whether the mechanism of AR derived in the lab through ex-vivo therapy mirrors the eventual clinical mode of AR.