Research Funded to Date

Statement of the Problem: Cancer develops in a sequenced manner. Patches of lung cells gain the ability to multiply faster than their neighboring normal cells by acquiring mutations. These patches of cells are called “premalignant lesions" (PMLs). Some of these lesions may eventually become cancer. Knowledge about how some PMLs may develop into lung cancer is central to developing tools for Cancer Interception—interrupting the cancer development process and blocking progression to advanced metastatic disease. However, we lack effective lung cancer interception approaches due to our incomplete understanding of the earliest molecular events associated with the development of lung cancer, as well as the challenge in developing personalized tools for early detection and prevention.

Proposed Solution: The Dream Team will use a holistic approach to understand the genetics, immunology, radiological (imaging) profile, and treatment response of patients who show evidence of abnormal lung tissue that puts them at high risk to develop lung cancer. The Team has access to unique groups of patient populations (adenocarcinoma—ADC and squamous cell carcinoma—SCC) with signs of lung cancer risk, and has assembled a collection of blood and tissue specimens from these individuals. The main objective of the Team is to understand how lung cancer develops and test methods that will block the development of cancer. Their three-pronged approach to solve this problem will include:

• Creation of a molecular pre-cancer genome atlas (PCGA) of the lung with the goal of identifying which types of precancerous lung tissue require aggressive treatment and which treatments will block the development of these abnormal lesions to invasive lung cancer.
• Development of two diagnostic tools that can be directly applied in the clinic for simple, yet accurate, detection of early lung cancer: 1) the use of nasal swabs, blood tests, and imaging to confirm whether lung abnormalities found on chest imaging are lung cancer or benign lung disease. 2) blood tests that can identify patients at the earliest stages of lung cancer recurrence, thus enabling their timely and effective intervention with therapies such as those that boost the immune system.
• Development of tests to identify which individuals are most likely to benefit from a number of treatment strategies to intercept lung cancer, including emerging immunotherapies.

Statement of the Problem: Currently, low dose CT (LDCT) screening for lung cancer is recommended for high-risk individuals, defined as current or former smokers (quit within the past 15 years) with a 30-or-more pack-year smoking history, 55 to 74 years of age, and with no evidence of lung cancer. However, uptake of LDCT screening has been impeded by high rates of false-positive results, which in turn add significant physical and emotional stress to patients as well as additional healthcare costs. Since LDCT is now commonly available, lung nodules detected in LDCT scans are plentiful, but imprecise guidelines for care make it a challenge to ensure quality follow-up and expedited diagnoses for those with lung cancer. Furthermore, screening is not available for those who don’t meet the screening criteria (younger age or low smoking history) when they are the exact population among whom lung cancer rates are rising.

Proposed Solution: Leveraging expertise of academic research centers (Massachusetts General Hospital, Broad Institute, and Stanford University) and a non-profit managed-care consortium (Kaiser Permanente), the Dream Team will develop a test called the Lung Cancer Interception Assay (LCIA) to complement LDCT screening.

The proposal is novel in that it will develop complex computational algorithms to combine high-sensitivity/high-accuracy blood-based molecular biomarkers with image-based biomarkers to create the  LCIA assay. At the end of the award period, a streamlined product, the LCIA, will be ready to use in population-level definitive trials for the early detection of lung cancer.

Side effects of immune checkpoint therapies, termed immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), are unique and generally secondary to inflammatory tissue damage. The onset and duration of irAEs are unpredictable and predisposing factors for individuals to develop irAEs remains unclear. Some irAEs that emerge with immune checkpoint blockade share clinical features of autoimmune conditions. Preexisting auto-reactive antibodies and their contribution to immune side effects with immunotherapy and radiation have not been defined. This maybe particularly relevant to immune related adverse effects, since recent studies suggest almost 8-9% of the US population carries autoimmune diseases and 26% of healthy individuals have strong IgG humoral responses to variety of self-antigens. For the proposed study, we will use a set of longitudinally collected patient blood samples from a clinical trial which evaluates the clinical activity of combination immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without local consolidative therapy (stereotactic body irradiation) 

We plan to follow preexisting auto-reactive antibodies, baseline T and B cell receptor clonality and their temporal dynamics for combination immune checkpoint therapy with or without radiation therapy and correlate these findings with irAEs and response to therapy.    

Immune-targeted agents have generated antitumor responses that are transforming cancer therapeutics in various tumors types including lung cancer. Despite the impressive responses observed, the majority of patients eventually experience therapeutic resistance after an initial response. Considering the increased cost to patients and health systems both financially and in terms of time spent in management of immune-related adverse effects it has become clear that success of immuno-oncology approaches depends on choosing patient populations most likely to benefit. Our proposed research addresses the urgent unmet clinical need to understand the underlying biology of response and develop molecular assays of response and resistance to immune targeted agents. We propose comprehensive genome-wide analyses of tumors and cell-free circulating DNA to examine how cancer genomes change during immune checkpoint blockade. Our approach is focused on discovery of mechanisms of resistance using a multidimensional strategy that combines comprehensive genomic analyses with functional assays of autologous T-cell reactivity. The underlying premise of this proposal is that through our comprehensive molecular analyses, we will identify changes in the genomic landscape of tumors during immune checkpoint blockade that mediate emergence of primary and acquired resistance to these therapies. Unravelling the genomic mechanisms through which cancer adapts to evade anti-tumor immune responses will be critical for future development of tailored cancer immunotherapy strategies. We envision that the results of the proposed research will be used to develop patient-specific immunotherapy approaches in lung cancer and will launch investigator-initiated clinical trials at Hopkins and other institutions.

Background: Osimertinib and other “third-generation” EGFR TKIs effectively overcome T790M-mediated resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer, but our understanding of acquired resistance in this setting remains limited. Importantly, the intrinsic heterogeneity of resistant cancers leads to clinical challenges. We hypothesize that in-depth study of 3rd-generation TKI resistance and the impact of genetic heterogeneity on treatment response will lead to improved therapeutic options and clinical outcomes. Study Design: We will analyze tumor biopsies, ctDNA and autopsy specimens using a variety of techniques such as next-generation sequencing, digital droplet PCR and whole exome sequencing to characterize heterogeneity in resistant cancers. In addition, we will run a prospective clinical trial to test a novel therapeutic combination designed to minimize heterogeneity and delay progression. On-treatment biopsies and ctDNA collection will be used to study how resistance develops. Impact: This project will leverage our broad array of clinical specimens, well-established translational research program and preexisting industry and academic collaborations to characterize the heterogeneity of resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. We hope to illuminate clinical and biologic implications of heterogeneity, with the ultimate goal of identifying more effective therapies for patients.